Four-day week may be considered a sign of failure, England councils told

The secretary for local government has written to all councils to warn that adopting a four-day week for staff puts them at risk of being declared a failing authority, according to reports.

Twenty-five councils have discussed a four-day week policy and one, South Cambridgeshire district council, has already moved to the pattern.

While councils are free to set their own policies, the government has the power to take control if an authority is deemed to be failing.

In a letter to councils seen by the Daily Telegraph, Steve Reed said that staff doing “part-time work for full-time pay” could be an indicator of “failure”.

He said: “The provision the current guidance makes in relation to the four-day week remains in force … I take this issue very seriously, in particular that ‘council staff undertaking part-time work for full-time pay without compelling justification’ would be considered an indicator, among a wide range of factors, of potential failure.

“I hope that makes my position on this matter and the government’s policy unambiguously clear to all councils. We will set out further detail in due course in the new best value guidance.”

The best value guidance for local authorities, last issued under the Conservatives in 2024, is being updated by Labour.

Earlier this year, Reed wrote to South Cambridgeshire warning that the four-day week policy had damaged its performance.

Reed wrote to Bridget Smith, the council’s Liberal Democrat leader, noting there had been a deterioration in rent collection and repairs by the council.

Smith said she was extremely disappointed to have received Reed’s letter, describing the authority as “exceptionally high performing”.

Proponents of the four-day week, such as the 4 Day Week Foundation, argue that the nine-to-five, five-day working week is outdated and no longer suits the realities of modern life.

They say British workers put in some of the longest full-time hours across Europe, yet have one of the least productive economies.​

A four-day, 32-hour working week with no loss of pay would lead to improved performance and lower costs, they argue.