By Shafiqul Haque:
August 5, 2025:
One year after the seismic events of the July Revolution, Bangladesh stands at a political crossroads. In the ashes of violence and the ouster of a long-entrenched regime, the July Charter has emerged not only as a roadmap for reform—but as a litmus test for whether this nation can rebuild its democracy with substance, not just slogans.
Drafted by the National Consensus Commission (NCC) under the interim leadership of Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, the Charter seeks to institutionalize the demands of a people who bled for change. It promises sweeping reforms—of Parliament, the Constitution, elections, and the judiciary—while acknowledging the brutal costs of inaction.
But as the post-revolution glow fades and political fragmentation returns, the core question looms larger than ever: Will Bangladesh seize this moment—or squander it?
A Rare Moment of Unity
In a nation long divided by dynastic politics, the formation of the NCC and the drafting of the Charter offered something rare: a unified national project. For the first time in decades, opposition parties, civil society, and student leaders found common ground.
The Charter’s 12 agreed points already mark a radical shift. No more rubber-stamp parliaments: MPs will vote independently, breaking the back of top-down authoritarianism inside parties. No more unchecked emergencies: fundamental rights can no longer be suspended at the whims of power. No more partisan Election Commissions: appointments will involve both the government and opposition.
These are not abstract principles. They address, head-on, the mechanisms that allowed authoritarianism to masquerade as democracy for years.
Still Unfinished—and Under Threat
Despite the progress, several critical questions remain unresolved:
Will the next election be overseen by a neutral caretaker government?
Will an upper legislative chamber be created to strengthen accountability?
How will reserved women’s seats be reformed to ensure real representation?
What will be the method of presidential election?
How will appointments to constitutional bodies be safeguarded from politicization?
And perhaps most urgently: How will the Charter be implemented and enforced?
There is no consensus. Some parties—like the National Citizen Party (NCP)—are calling for a binding Legal Framework Order (LFO) or a public referendum. Others, like the BNP, prefer parliamentary ratification with symbolic constitutional recognition. Religious parties want stronger guarantees before they commit to the next election.
The Charter hangs in legal and political limbo. And that is dangerous.
Real Reform or Repackaged Power?
Let us be clear: Bangladesh has seen reform promises before—after 1990, after 2006, and again following the 2018 election. In each case, the momentum was hijacked by the political class.
But the July Revolution was different. It wasn’t orchestrated by party elites. It rose from the streets—from students and citizens who wanted a country governed by justice, not fear.
The Charter was born of that demand. If ignored, it would not just be a betrayal of protestors’ sacrifices—it would be a missed opportunity to rewrite our political DNA.
The Two-Year Countdown
The Charter lays out a clear timeline: all structural reforms must be implemented within two years of the next elected parliament taking office. That means the upcoming election is more than a leadership contest—it will determine the trajectory of Bangladesh’s political rebirth.
Delaying or diluting this promise would be tantamount to abandoning the revolution itself.
A Fragile Hope Worth Protecting
The July Charter is not perfect. It is a compromise document born of national trauma. But it is also the most detailed and participatory vision for reform that Bangladesh has ever seen.
For now, it remains a fragile hope—but one still worth fighting for.
Bangladesh has been given a second chance. Let’s not waste it.
Writer:
Shafiqul Haque
Former Mayor, Tower Hamlets
Solicitor and Advocate
London, United Kingdom